(December 28, 2020 at 3:37 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote:(December 28, 2020 at 3:27 pm)SUNGULA Wrote: I must disagree. This assumes he believed people would link his ownership of the RV to him being the bomber.He provided proof that he was the bomber, the larger bones survived the blast. Edge back from the absurd.
Faulty logic there hoss.
If you find the homeowner's body in a house that was purposely set ablaze - would that prove the homeowner to be the arsonist?
