RE: The pants that is free-verse
January 19, 2021 at 12:32 pm
(This post was last modified: January 19, 2021 at 12:34 pm by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
(January 19, 2021 at 11:42 am)Rhizomorph13 Wrote: To be fair to Pollock though, some of his work is moving, which brings to my mind that any artistic endeavor is comprised of a start, a good measure of doing, then deciding when to stop. Some of his paintings are moving because he chose a good stopping point.
There is a dude right now doing spin art using swings with paint in them and while I'm, at first, infuriated by the simplicity and randomness of his art. I must concede that he is having fun AND selling them shits at a profit.
There is also Damien Hirst who does a few different kinds of art but spin paintings are among his work.
https://www.artsy.net/artist-series/dami...-paintings
It must be me - I find it difficult to be ‘moved’ by a painting that looks like nothing so much as if someone have vomited a black bean burrito over a perfectly good piece of canvas.
As for Hirst, I had a Spirograph when I was a kid. Hard to spot the difference.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax