Turning the tables on atheism

[Angrboda]

You've moved from claiming that it's highly probable that the beliefs have been rationally reconciled (for which we have no evidence) to there is no reason to believe theism is incoherent.

Even if I believed that, it's a different argument.  Stop moving the goalposts and settle on an argument.  Please restate the argument which you want us to consider.

Whether any of the objections to theism are conclusive is a matter of debate and another claim that you have not provided evidence for.  Are you just content to engage in a Gish Gallop?

I didn't change anything, read the post more carefully, please. My argument stands : it's highly probable that they have been reconciled. Do you disagree? You say we have no evidence that theism is coherent, well, we usually don't try to prove a negative (there is no contradiction in theism), we simply say : atheists were trying with this problem for thousands of years and didn't manage to come up with a contradiction, therefore it's almost certain that there is none.

First of all, I never said theists have no evidence that theism is coherent, so stop peddling falsehoods. By my count you've made three arguments in this thread:

a) There's a high probability that Muslim believers have successfully rationally reconciled their beliefs, therefore something something something;
b) Nobody has been able to conclusively show theism is false, therefore something something something;
c) Nobody can show that theism is incoherent, therefore something something something;

Pick a fucking lane and stick to it!

Regarding 'a', as I've already noted, this is an argument that requires evidence and you've provided none and so the argument fails.