RE: Are lockdowns justified?
April 27, 2021 at 10:39 am
(This post was last modified: April 27, 2021 at 10:44 am by FlatAssembler.
Edit Reason: grammar error
)
(April 27, 2021 at 10:34 am)arewethereyet Wrote:(April 27, 2021 at 10:32 am)FlatAssembler Wrote: Donald Trump said that COVID-19 will disappear naturally. And, when you think about that, thinking that does not appear so silly. In fact, it seems to me that, if you apply the knowledge of high-school biology, that is what you would expect. So I want to know why it is wrong, exactly. Which logical fallacy are both Donald Trump and I committing when thinking about whether it is to be expected that COVID-19 disappears naturally?
Did small pox disappear naturally? What would make you think that as long as a virus/germ/bacteria has a host it will just magically disappear?
Really not the same thing. Again, smallpox is a DNA virus, so it is not nearly as prone to mutation. Furthermore, smallpox had very closely related viruses with which it could presumably (I haven't checked it) mate (cowpox...) to reduce the impact of those mutations. No virus closely related to COVID-19 attacks humans so that COVID-19 can mate with it.
(April 27, 2021 at 10:34 am)Eleven Wrote:(April 27, 2021 at 10:32 am)FlatAssembler Wrote: Donald Trump said that COVID-19 will disappear naturally. And, when you think about that, thinking that does not appear so silly. In fact, it seems to me that, if you apply the knowledge of high-school biology, that is what you would expect. So I want to know why it is wrong, exactly. Which logical fallacy are both Donald Trump and I committing when thinking about whether it is to be expected that COVID-19 disappears naturally?
What comes to mind is yours and his ignorance of science.
So, if you are less ignorant of science, answer my question. Why didn't COVID-19 die from inbreeding after jumping from bats to humans?