has Biden done a good job as president?

[Angrboda]

The article you cite states that a little less than a fifth of the U.N. budget is contributed by the U.S., which would be 20%.  Even your own source refutes you.

how much does jeff bezos own of amazon? how much of tesla does elon musk own? 70% 60? maybe 50? no Bezos owns 10% and musk owns 20% yet they have controlling interest and are incharge of the direction of those companies. why because even @ 10% bezos has the majority share. That is the parallel im trying to communicate with you people. the US is the largest donner has the most skin in the Game at the UN, as such will be taxed the hardest when ever the un moves against another country. look at history moron! durning the gulf war who was the lead representative of the collision force? who lead unforces in gulf war II? @ the same 20% mind you.

That doesn't have anything to do with what I said. You cited an article that refuted your statement that it was a little more than the 22% that Boru said it was, when your own article said that it was a little less than 20%. The rest of what you wrote has dick to do with whether you were right about the figure being more than 22%. You're just babbling a bunch of irrelevant crap.

First of all, monetary funding of the U.N. isn't any kind of share as the distribution of power and votes in the various bodies of the U.N. is not based upon it.  

trump proved this wrong. when he decided to pull the us out of the un unless the other countries put in their fair share.

Um, no he didn't. I think you've got the U.N. confused with NATO, as well as a Trumpian misunderstanding of NATO. Regardless, this is just bullshit. It wouldn"t prove what you say even if it were true.

Second, even if it were comparable, the U.S. would NOT be a majority shareholder.

You are a fucking moron.

if i'm a moron and have been proved right.. (my article says the us is the majority share holder in the un, plus i demonstrated a majority share hold does not have to own 51% of a company) then how stupid are you? quite less than a moron huh?

Neither the word 'majority' nor the word 'shareholder' appear in your article. Nowhere does the article say anything close to that. So you're wrong as usual. And nowhere have you demonstrated any contrary fact about what majority shareholding means. It simply doesn't mean what you want it to mean.

So, no, you're wrong, again. And delusional. And likely hallucinating. And a fucking moron.