RE: Politics and Twitter.
May 6, 2021 at 7:59 am
(This post was last modified: May 6, 2021 at 7:59 am by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:At least we agree that what the juror said is f'd up. Respect to you for not trying to defend what he said.Where did I say that? I said it was irrelevant.
Quote:Did he believe what he said?No, it's a fact he didn't lie during jury selection. Which kills the defense's complaint.
Quote: Your position seems to be that we can't prove that he believes what he said himself.No, my position is the defense is going to have a near-impossible time showing that he lied during jury selection or that any potential bias seriously impacted the verdict. A point that some lawyers have already pointed out.
Quote:That could be true.It is true because he didn't lie. Which kills the defense's complaint.
Quote: Maybe he doesn't believe it or stopped believing it at some point, but when something is said by someone, generally people take them on their word that that is what they genuinely believe.My point once again is the defense will have to prove he lied during jury selection and that he did so with malice as well as proving that it significantly impacted the verdict. That's pretty much impossible.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM