(May 12, 2021 at 1:41 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:(May 12, 2021 at 10:34 am)WinterHold Wrote: You need to read their holy book again when it says:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Promised_L...ne_promise
They tried to expand and take Egypt in 1956:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suez_Crisis
They tried to expand and take Syria in 1967:
But Israel failed miserably, they know exactly that today it won't be the "weak Arab armies" fighting them but huge Islamic countries like Turkey, Pakistan and Iran.
That's a little history lesson on the nature of this "Zionist proxy"; without western support it will be a zero on the left. Which is probably is, now.
They did not try to ‘take Egypt’, nor did they ‘fail miserably’. They went in to take the Suez Canal, which Nasser had just nationalized in violation of law. Israel withdrew because of pressure from other countries, not because of military failure.
As for the Six Day War, it was an unqualified Israeli success.
Read your own links.
Boru
They did try to take Cairo and install their own vessel as president instead of Abdul-Nasser:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suez_Crisis
Quote:The aims were to regain control of the Suez Canal for the Western powers and to remove Egyptian president Gamal Abdel Nasser, who had just nationalised the canal.[21][url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suez_Crisis#cite_note-21][/url]
In that regard; they failed "miserably": Abdul-Nasser wasn't removed, the Canal stayed "Egyptian" too.
As for the Six-Day War, yes..it was a big, big big tragedy for Arabs, and an evidence that the Arab governments are not worthy.
It's not an evidence for Israeli superiority though. They got their asses kicked in the previous war along with Britain and France.
