(May 17, 2021 at 12:55 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote:(May 17, 2021 at 12:08 pm)Drich Wrote: i left video of this up in this thread. the only people missed it are those who single source their news from the fake news media. this is common knoweledge for anyone who wants to know the truth. again example all you have to do is click on the videos provided and watch the cops literally invite protesters in.
So what, Dripshit. You are so fucking gullible and childish.
Your cherry picked video does not tell the story. Either you know that, and lying, or you're just stupid. Maybe both.
The full SET of videos are what they are. They are not "single source" anything.
The Insurrection Commission will look at everything that happened, and fool liar and deniers, not unlike yourself, will be shown to be the traitirs you are.
"Some" of the cops will be found to be complicit in the crimes, as everyone knows. What, you live under a rock. Oh well. You do. Even an active duty Marine was an assaulter.
The fact that a few criminal cops let some in, does not give anyone the right to even *go*in, and certainly not to destroy all that government property.
Yeah, you cherry pick your videos, and then lie abut what actually happened. You're such a low-life.
Your god Trump LIED and said he would go down to the capitol with them. He ABANDONED them. THEY have said that. You're promoting mob rule, idiot.
We also get you actually know nothing about the riot/insurrection. MULTIPLE (that means more than one Drippy) entrances to the capitol were entered and breached.
NOT just the one where the crooked police let them in.
Let me make it simple at your simple level.
If a security guard lets in some burglars to a business, does that make it OK for the burglers to destroy and rob shit ?
That's what you're saying here, that it is OK.
Multiple sources.
videos.
my slow friend.. your videos are at best tertiary source material, as the video's themselves have commentators to tell you what to think about the video. the MOMENT these videos is edited and compiled in a specific way to lend it self or to draw out a narrative your videos can be dismissed as active governement propaganda..
did you not see the difference between the multiple sourced raw video only commented by the person co-witnessing said events, of capitol police opening what was a locked door and guide people into the building. these men openly wrong full police uniforms. they were clearly on the inside while the protesters were on the outside until the door was opened and people/protesters let in... do you not see the difference between you 3 second videos and 10 second explaination of what you saw verses witnessing the full event of being locked out door open by police and escorted into the building?
That is the difference between primary source material ( actual unedited eye witness film)
Secondary material (eye witness testimony/someone telling you who was there what had happened)
Tertiary material, like you news cast/someone explaining third hand what had happened.
then you have fake news/ Government propaganda. where videos are highly edited from many different povs and sources all to tell one story a piece at a time because no one source can tell or proof the web being spun by several sources at once.
If you ever went to school wrote a paper or researched anything in the real world you would understand how a primary sourced material TRUMP 1000 propaganda videos. how secondary material ALWAYS TRUMPS propaganda. How even Tertiary material TRUMPS your fake news/gov propaganda.
So again sport it is not enough just to have three sources to quote from. your source material must be credible. when you quoted a news cast who chops together and eddits 10 different video sources to tell one story then you are quoting propaganda. as real reporting allows the material/proof tell the story on it's own. if your news were real they would not need a compilation of videos to sell you a story. one irrufutable video would do it.
Like how my video refutes the idea that the crowd in masse tried to loot an destroy the capitol building. that this same crowd identified someone who was trying to break a window as intifa in a trump hat, not only stopped him but beat him up for his trouble. it wasnt till after this person was well under control and those people had all calmed back down did the police react with gas. which triggered the panic the news clip showed, and announced it as a crowd of people trying to break in, while they were trying to get away from the gas. it is completely disgusting how you allow yourself to be manipulated and controlled just to paint your neighbor in the worst possible light. not only that you sell every ounce of integrity to do it.
