The meaninglessness of the Christian god concept

[Captain Scarlet]

Well I vote we remove the word God from the dictionary then as there clearly is no defininition. </sarcasm>

And brilliant wit, well done! We are not talking about definitions, but a primary attribute. Shall we add straw man or would I be ‘bleating’.

If there is a definition of God anywhere, we can dissmiss point 1.

Wrong

The premise of Ms Scarletts

‘Mr’ unless that was more excellent sarcasm

argument seems to be based upon a first proven physical existence

Wrong again, I don’t mention materialism its another straw man.

which when considering the subject in hand is contradictory nonsense.

Go ahead knock your straw man down

He bleats

The lady (or gentleman) protests too much me thinks.

As if using the word 'bleats' to replace the word 'presents', has any bearing on the truth value of said proposition.

on about there not being a primary attribute when he is clearly presented with one.

You mean when you presented that gods primary attribute was that of being a god (diety). Yep that was a winner and cleared up all the mystery. We all now know what a god is and his positively identified status in reality.

He dissmisses the point without reason.

I said in posts #3, #8 and #12 that wyou were begging the question. Because you were using God (the diety in xtianity) to provide a primary attribute of God.

He calls a fallacy and then thoroughly doen't state why.

See post #3. I didn’t expect to have to repeat myself once I called out why the first time and you didn’t challenge it, but if you are going to have selective amnesia perhaps I should.

Saying it is so is no reason to accept that it is so I'm afraid,

You have had it

so with a distinct lack of argument we can conclude that the OP argument is what it appears to be: baseless.

As previously stated it is you who have no basis for your rejoinder yet you continue this silly line of no case to answer because “god=god, so there” and projecting your wearisome and poorly constructed arguments back onto me does not add force to your case.

If you want to argue FOR Theism, just identify the primary attribute of the Christian god, ie positively describe his nature. His primary attribute should be consistent with his secondary and relational attributes. I have already explained the argument to you and informed you why I don’t think your rejoinders hit the mark.