(July 19, 2021 at 1:52 pm)HappySkeptic Wrote: I will not defend IAs statement. My frustration isn't about rape apologetics.
But I will say this place is becoming a mono-culture, with low tolerance for other points of view. It becomes boring patting each other on the back for our correct views, rather than having actual discussions.
What "actual discussions" are not happening here? What discussions do you think you're missing out on because of people being banned? Be the change you want to see. It's an atheist forum with a ton of veteran atheists on it. If you want better/fresher blood, maybe recruit folks from other sites who you think would add to those deep conversations you wanna have. Make the topics of things you want to discuss.
By the by, you DID defend IAs statement. To me. So, great job moving the goal posts forward and back again. Whether you want to talk about it or not, the recent bans were for rape apologetics. So, comingin here complaining about other opinions not being allowed without defining WHAT other opinions, it does come across like you're aligning yourself with those who have openly stated how rape isn't a big deal in their eyes. So, please define that. WHAT opinions? WHAT discussions?