[Serious] PSA: Rape Apologetics

[The Architect Of Fate]

"The problem is that a man can also force a nonconsenting woman to engage in sex without resort to actual 'violence.' Power will do. The 'rape as violence' approach may strengthen the case for punishing violently coerced sex, but it may do so at the cost of obscuring the case for punishing forced sex in the absence of physical violence." 

"The available data suggest that while violent stranger rape may be among the most frequently reported crimes in this country, the non-traditional rape―the case involving non-strangers, less force, no beatings, no weapons―may be among the least frequently reported, even when its victims perceive it to be "rape." In many if not most of these cases, forced sex is tolerated by its victims as unavoidable, if not 'normal" (Estrich, 1986).

References: Estrich, S. (1986). Rape. The Yale Law Journal, 95, 1087-1184.

I've presented these references to you in the past. Respectfully, it's a shame that your position remains outdated.

If you’re going to characterize someone else’s opinion as ‘outdated’, quoting a 35 year old article might not be your best move.

Boru

Also using your position to force someone into having sex is a form of violence

---

I guess If you repeat something enough times, it must be true? where did I state any of the drivel you just spewed? I'm simply stating the trial was a farce, somehow you guys made the leap in logic for that to mean being in favor of rape? Are you stupid?

You were essentially jumping for fucking joy that a rapist was freed