RE: PSA: Rape Apologetics
July 19, 2021 at 7:25 pm
(This post was last modified: July 19, 2021 at 7:37 pm by LadyForCamus.)
(July 19, 2021 at 1:52 pm)HappySkeptic Wrote: I will not defend IAs statement. My frustration isn't about rape apologetics.
But I will say this place is becoming a mono-culture, with low tolerance for other points of view. It becomes boring patting each other on the back for our correct views, rather than having actual discussions.
Can you explain to me your reasoning behind why you think that 1. “Rapists should not be held responsible if their victim is unlikeable,” and 2. “Performing sexual acts on an incapacitated person isn’t rape,” are points of view that provide starters for productive, meaningful discussion? How does the culture of the forum suffer from not providing a platform for those points of view? And do you think the expression of those points of view harm anyone? If you believe the potential benefits of hosting that rhetoric outweighs the potential harm, please explain what they are.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.
