RE: PSA: Rape Apologetics
July 20, 2021 at 12:52 pm
(This post was last modified: July 20, 2021 at 12:53 pm by John 6IX Breezy.)
(July 20, 2021 at 12:14 am)arewethereyet Wrote: At this point, I don't think anyone is confused as to the intent of the announcement made.
Nobody is confused about the intent—but questions remain concerning the poor execution.
Drich was banned before the PSA went up. IA was banned while discussing the rules in this very thread. I was previously banned for my comments on violence. And Belacqua was previously accused of being a rape apologist for mentioning that statutory rape is statutory in nature.
It's unclear how my comments (which stem from feminist legal scholars) unequivocally promote sexual assault, downplay sexual assault, or victim-blame. Clearly, the "not limited to" clause is insidious in nature.