RE: PSA: Rape Apologetics
July 20, 2021 at 2:26 pm
(This post was last modified: July 20, 2021 at 2:26 pm by LadyForCamus.)
(July 20, 2021 at 2:17 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote:I’m not arguing against a statute of limitations. That’s an entirely different discussion. I’m asking Huggy if 58 accusers against one man is reason enough to conclude he’s likely a rapist. Huggy is the one who brought statute of limitations into the conversation. And no, I’m not trying to “trap” anyone into getting in trouble with the rules.(July 20, 2021 at 2:00 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: So you don’t actually care if he raped someone. As long as he can’t be held accountable by the legal system you’re good with it?
There's nothing wrong with defending the statute of limitations. In one of my classes on human memory we studied a phenomenon that occurred sometime mid-1900s in which people were being accused of rape because of false childhood memories suggested under hypnosis, and later by the media
Such limitations protect all parties involved. There's no reason why someone who brings this up should be in danger of excommunication from the forum.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.