RE: PSA: Rape Apologetics
July 20, 2021 at 3:23 pm
(This post was last modified: July 20, 2021 at 3:24 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:Are you aware that feminist legal scholars argue that use of fraud to procure sex ought to be covered under rape laws? This includes taking off your condom without her knowledge, lying about sexually transmitted diseases, and even claiming to be single when you are actually married.All of those can be regarded as acts of violence
Individuals such as yourself, tend to not view such acts as rape, precisely because of outdated views on consent and violence. Take a look at this article and it's accompanying psychological studies:
Quote:There's nothing wrong with defending the statute of limitations. In one of my classes on human memory we studied a phenomenon that occurred sometime mid-1900s in which people were being accused of rape because of false childhood memories suggested under hypnosis, and later by the mediaIt had nothing to do with the statutes of limitation. Huggy was celebrating the fact a rapist went free.
Such limitations protect all parties involved. There's no reason why someone who brings this up should be in danger of excommunication from the forum.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM