what bi or ass?
We all have them, I'm just saying that it's disingenuous for someone who won't allow for the immaterial because it's unreliable or materially immeasurable to participate in a conversation they obviously have no intent on seeing the other side of. If he'd have just stated his objections and view clearly then left it alone, most of this would have been left at "It's logically unlikely theologically that there isn't free will in Heaven" Or in this case "There's no way to materialistically test what happens to your soul after you die as it's immaterial at the loosest definition, but here's a postulation in answer to the question"
5th- Everyone has a bias, but presentation of documented, albeit subjective, experiences of potential after death scenarios with logical explanations of the immaterial is the closest anyone will get at this point to an answer to the OP question. Now when someone wants to figure out testing methods of the immaterial I'd support that. It's better than blindly assuming countless documented cases are all by those crazy Christians, despite them having no religious dependencies, not thatanyone or everyone does that, but a lot of atheists I've spoken with feel that way and share it regularly.
We all have them, I'm just saying that it's disingenuous for someone who won't allow for the immaterial because it's unreliable or materially immeasurable to participate in a conversation they obviously have no intent on seeing the other side of. If he'd have just stated his objections and view clearly then left it alone, most of this would have been left at "It's logically unlikely theologically that there isn't free will in Heaven" Or in this case "There's no way to materialistically test what happens to your soul after you die as it's immaterial at the loosest definition, but here's a postulation in answer to the question"
5th- Everyone has a bias, but presentation of documented, albeit subjective, experiences of potential after death scenarios with logical explanations of the immaterial is the closest anyone will get at this point to an answer to the OP question. Now when someone wants to figure out testing methods of the immaterial I'd support that. It's better than blindly assuming countless documented cases are all by those crazy Christians, despite them having no religious dependencies, not thatanyone or everyone does that, but a lot of atheists I've spoken with feel that way and share it regularly.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
