(November 13, 2011 at 12:36 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:(November 13, 2011 at 11:53 am)Blam! Wrote: Can't the lack of evidence in the existence of god considered as a logical evidence to back up his claims?
Saying there's a total lack of evidence that earwigs climb into people's ears and shit icecream is reasonable because there is a lack of evidence that could be collected. But to say we can safely say that there is no God because of a lack of evidence that cannot ever be collected is not.
Who says we cannot collect evidence of god? Those that have an interest is protecting the god delusion? christians with their "definition".
