(November 13, 2011 at 6:48 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:Ah ok.(November 13, 2011 at 4:52 pm)Blam! Wrote: It'd be easy to conclude god may not involved.I think I know what you are saying, but could you clarify please.
What is book? They're consist of papers, words and language - in which are a product of human culture. Dead Sea Scrolls are also one of human makings. The point is our creativity doesn't require god and we created the bible - despite the claims of bible as a God's word.
But, I'm not sure if there's scientific research on the origin of creativity, language.
(November 13, 2011 at 6:48 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:What is the evidence do you have can be logically deduced?(November 13, 2011 at 4:52 pm)Blam! Wrote:The evidence we have of God is what we can logically deduce. We can test that for logical soundness.(November 13, 2011 at 2:13 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: You must use the method appropriate to the subject. If the unicorn is meant to be a physically evidenced creature then it would be appropriate to expect physical evidence.What is appropriate word to explain the existence of god? Faith, right?
(November 13, 2011 at 6:48 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:Yeah. And I don't think if the existence of god with basis of faith can be logically deduced.(November 13, 2011 at 4:52 pm)Blam! Wrote:Well at some point they have to meet. But yes, you get the picture.(November 13, 2011 at 2:13 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: If you requested the same of a methematical equasion, for example, then requiring physical evidence of that equasion would be absurd.
But mathematical equations are one of theories to describe of our understanding of the universe. The mathematical formula like kinetic energy - explaining how much energy in traveling projectile or amount of energy produced by asteroid crashing into ground.
I understand what are you trying to say that science and faith is mutually excessive.