(October 24, 2021 at 9:35 pm)vulcanlogician Wrote: Neo, do you think anything Aquinas says is at odds with modern science? If not, what are your replies to HappySkeptic's concerns? If so, how would you adapt Aquinas's position to better accommodate what we know about the natural world?
I'm a poor philosopher, so may have missed the point.
I seem to remember Aristotle (?) claiming for example that it was an essence or quality which makes a thing say big or small. That a thing is big because it contains the essence /quality of 'bigness'
Was it Aristotle who claimed that the speed of light was instantaneous?
