(November 1, 2021 at 6:40 pm)GaryAnderson Wrote:(November 1, 2021 at 6:37 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Your court considers atheism a religion only for the purposes of First Amendment protections. They don’t consider it a religion for things like tax exemptions and charity.
SSDD
Boru
This is correct and I illustrate it show how “ways of life” court meanings have different definitions from dictionary meanings. Thank you for answering both questions.
(November 1, 2021 at 6:38 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: That’s a stupid question. It’s also a clumsy evasion.
You’re really not very good at this.
Boru
Okay so you’re out. Lol
You make a nonsensical analogy and then throw your hands up.
It’s not nonsensical at all. You tried to make the case that non-belief is the equivalent of a belief system, with the insidious implication that atheists aren’t really atheists at all.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax