The Sects of Atheism

[Neo-Scholastic]

No. I am suggesting that Helios presented an opinion on a complex topic as if it were a settled fact. At the same time, I am also noting that as a general rule the evidence offered by a theist will not meet the evidentiary standard for an atheist. Again, this is a difference of opinion, not a character flaw or lack of intelligence on anyone's part.

My reasons for not believing are a settled fact and not a 'cover story' and the insinuation that atheists are using 'cover stories' to hide their real reasons for not believing is insulting, uncharitable, and IMHO, trolling.

I hope you aren't referring in any way to me here. I thought I was demonstrating epistemic humility while at the same time suggesting to Helios that what he presented as fact was properly an opinion. The idea I was suggesting, that it is okay for people have different belief thresholds for various kinds of evidence,...that idea sounds very tolerant to me. I expected a little debate but intended no insult to Helios in particular or other contributors in general. Please help me understand how my words may have offended so I avoid doing so in the future.

Or if you you want to debate a little about whether it is in fact okay for people to have different belief thresholds....if you want.