My own moral + ontological argument.

[Oldandeasilyconfused]

I have an argument for God but a lot of it is based on premises that are disputable.

You don't have an argument then.

Well yes,he DOES have an argument, but it's a weak poorly reasoned one which does not survive the most casual scrutiny. (It's not too bad if the OP is an adolescent or young adult still learning to think critically))

IF you are going to posit an eternal reality,you need to explain what you mean by the term. Further, because you have made a positive claim; you attract the burden of proof. IE you need to prove your claim.

In claiming morality has objective truths, you are also claiming there are universal moral truths.I'd be ever so grateful if you would jot down a list.

Bored now