RE: My own moral + ontological argument.
November 18, 2011 at 7:32 pm
(This post was last modified: November 18, 2011 at 7:33 pm by Oldandeasilyconfused.)
Quote:And a lot of theists do find this argument sound.
Argumentum ad populum( argument by consensus) and irrelevant..
Also a non sequitor based on a false dichotomy.; the existence of objective morality would imply (suggest) but not prove the existence of God. The argument presupposes that a god is the possible source of objective reality. This assumption is false.
The claim that no objective morality proves no God is also invalid,for the same reason.
Still bored.
PS "a lot of theists" are fucking idiots.