(December 21, 2021 at 1:52 pm)Jehanne Wrote: In the this case, the punishment does not fit the "crime". JD very (very) carelessly downloaded illicit images (which, speaking from a purely hypothetical POV, can be "safely" done using Tails + anonymous public WiFi + Tor Bridges + VeraCrypt with 40 to 60 long passphrase with multiple keyfiles, not doxing oneself, offline viewing with Tails only, secure hardware management, observing the "Silence is Golden" rule, which means invoking the 5th whenever the police approach, etc.), and now, his wife and children have to suffer the lifelong consequences of a man who has not committed any abusive acts over the last decade, so far as anyone knows.
And, so, who are the victims from JD's acts? Will any of them show-up at his sentencing hearing?
Jehanne, I hope to Hell we're not witnessing a glimpse into a Kadence Pinder situation. I hope to Hell this is just me overreacting to a woman who has A) some pretty radical civil libertarian beliefs, and B) done a terrifying amount of research into how monsters like these work.
Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.
I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.
I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.