RE: Illustrating the burden of proof - pay me!
February 7, 2022 at 5:42 pm
(This post was last modified: February 7, 2022 at 5:43 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
Can you give an example of a proposition which is consistent with observation but not consistent with evidence? Synonymous use cases suggest that any problem with evidence as semantics would also be a problem in the same way and for all of the same reasons if we instead used "consistent with observation".
Are you sure there's a problem with the word?
Are you sure there's a problem with the word?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!