(February 16, 2022 at 8:58 am)GrandizerII Wrote: No, he's generally correct. You can often prove the negative.
The issue is that you're referring to the strict deductive sense of the word "proof" when that isn't necessary here.
Also, atheists need to let go of this delusion that WLC is a dummy when it comes to logic. This guy is more trained in logic and critical thinking than most of us here.
Perhaps, but he comes off as even more smug than me.
<insert profound quote here>
