Quote:That's exactly right. That's why both sides have a responsibility to provide (what they consider to be) facts.Nope only the side claiming something has that responsibility
Quote:"You can't prove X is false, therefore X is true" is obviously a ridiculous argument.This is true
Quote:howeverNope, it's you stating the reason you don't accept their claim and it's the only reason you need to reject a claim. You can still hear them out but that's it.
"You assert that X is true, and I reject that but I don't have to say why" is an evasion -- just a way of saying that you don't want to have a conversation.
Quote:Neither tactic is acceptable in grown-up discussions.Too bad the latter is not a tactic and yes it's totally acceptable. The negative position has no burden nor any need other than the lack of a reason to accept the claim.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM