(February 18, 2022 at 8:43 am)Jehanne Wrote:(February 18, 2022 at 1:19 am)Belacqua Wrote: Here you are giving your reasons for rejecting the claim that God exists.
The fact that (according to you) it has never been seen, experienced via the senses, or known empirically, is your counter evidence -- the reason you put forward as sufficient to deny the claim. (Actually you are saying the same thing three times, but it still constitutes a reason.) So you are not just saying that the burden of proof is on the believer -- you are arguing back. This is what I think we should all do.
That's fine, but many of us place God in the same category as the FSM.
Yeah, which is kinda dumb, considering the FSM is a physical being whereas God (in the classical theist sense) is not.