(April 5, 2022 at 7:11 pm)brewer Wrote: I think that for soft science 85% is probably about as good as it gets, to many non replicable variables. Don't claim a 'crisis' where there is not real crisis.
There is a question mark in the thread title. I'm not claiming a crisis. I just think it's an issue worth discussing. I also think that 85% is unacceptable, even for a soft science. Even psychologists were surprised to see such a low rate. If 85% is the best we can expect, lawmakers and clinicians are putting way too much stock in what these studies say.
***
@John 6IX Breezy
What's your opinion on this? (Since it's in your field of study....?)
