Do you know WikiIslam ?

[Ferrocyanide]

But why did you not mention that islam killed the scientific golden age of arab cultures?

Lol, it's called the Islamic golden age, not the Arabic Golden age.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_Golden_Age

Many famous scholars of this era weren't Arabs, such as Al-Khwarizmi (persian), who presented the first systematic solution of linear and quadratic equations.

I didn't say the Arabic golden age.
You also didn't respond to my comment's point.

However, thanks for the reply.

---

You declared than Wikiislam : "Attempts to find scientific errors in the Qur'an [News flash : there are none]"
My answer is the next. If we interpret literally Al-Qur'an evolution of species isn't mentioned and this is scientifically proven.

The Qur'an not mentioning something doesn't mean it's against it. The Qur'an also doesn't mention that there are five daily prayers, a central tenet of Islam, which all Muslims (are supposed to) apply rigorously.

It's normal that the Koran won't mention Evolution theory. Primitive humans had forgotten much of their past and also, they were not there to witness the development of the Universe, stars, planets, life on Earth.
At some point in time (history doesn’t record this. We call it pre-history), humans started to develop a language and expressed themselves.
So, at some point in time, some human asked the big questions:
1. What am I?
2. Where do I come from?
3. Why does stuff exist?
4. Who made all this?
5. What happens when I die? What happened to my dead parents, my dead child, my dead friend?
and so on.

Who knows who that first person was.
It is clear that multiple cultures developed their own answers to these questions and so, they ended up with different religions.
Sure, most of them settled on the idea of gods, which are basically supermen or some fantastic alien lifeforms, and the most important thing: the idea of the soul.

These are the lowest hanging fruits, that any primitive human can reach and pluck out of the tree.

Things like Evolution theory, plate tectonic theory, the shape of the Earth, the internal composition of the Earth, the solar system, the periodic table of the elements and plenty more are the high hanging fruits.

On other words, all religions do not mention these things and one could claim that all religions are not against such scientific concepts.

However, if the gods are making humans and so on, then it is not nature that is doing it and therefore, religions and science do not fit together.

Non sequitur. Our species appearing "slowly" doesn't mean there is no first human. The first member of our species to ever appear can be the first human, what's the problem with that?

The problem with that is that you are going to have to explain it to biologist.

It is hard to determine who is the first human since in terms of biology, a human doesn't have an exact definition.
All that a biologist can do is give a rough description of what a human is.
We if are going to use DNA, then which sections of DNA make us human? What happens when those sections are slightly changed?

The same concept arises with words such as short and long. They don’t have an exact definition.
If you have a bunch of sticks of different lengths and you order them from short to long, at what point does the transition takes place from short to long?

And if you are claiming that there was a first human, who were his family members? Were they human as well?