Crisis in Psychology?

[John 6IX Breezy]

Here is a short comment published in Science Magazine, presenting some arguments against the original Open Science studies that sparked the replication debate. They discuss issues with statistical errors, power, and bias in the replication studies, and conclude that reproducibility is quite high when corrected. (Some of these problems came to mind when I was thinking about why replication is problematic—such as taking samples from a population that differs from the original in any way.)