(June 18, 2022 at 10:49 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: Not to be too tangental but it seems to me that the whole conversation hinges on what someone considers to be "real". If one starts with the assumption that matter/energy and its operation exhaust the category then there is not much room left, none actually, to talk about the reality of intangible things such as triangles, holes, and past events.
It also seems careless to me if we just assume that "objective" equals "real," and "subjective" equals "illusion."
It's not so simple.
