The existence of God

[R00tKiT]

I take it that you dont think, then, that organic chemistry is any less plausible an explanation for life than some god?  I could come up with more if you like, obviously not limited to just those two.

Let's say organic chemistry is the scientific explanation for life, but not the full explanation. The thing is, theists argue that explanations work on more than one level.

I explained that in detail in a previous comment : https://atheistforums.org/thread-64357-p...pid2112546.

You’re right though, we do see factories pumping out machines.  Do you expect to find a little baby biplane snuggled somewhere in the middle of a space shuttle?  I don’t, and you won’t, and that’s one pretty obvious difference between designed things and organically derived things.

 
As a matter of fact yes, I can very well encounter a broken biplane in the middle of nowhere, or some remnants of, say, some uncompleted space project. I mean, it's not rare that people lose objects or leave them behind in all kinds of places ?

I have a big problem with the distinction you made above : designed things versus organically derived things, don't you see that you're already smuggling the conclusion that organically derived things aren't designed ?