I question the motives and intellectual honesty of anyone who needs to redefine words ("pure rationalism") to make his argument.
Pro tip: what the OP describes is not rationalism - and naturalists don't depend solely on rationalism. What he describes us closer to empiricism.
Nothing to see here, move along.
Pro tip: what the OP describes is not rationalism - and naturalists don't depend solely on rationalism. What he describes us closer to empiricism.
Nothing to see here, move along.