I can't say that downloading music is morally wrong.
If the pro-copyright movement could have their way, you'd be paying every time you heard a song. It's beyond protecting artists. It's just an absurd position and it's a result of the commercialization of art.
Is charging a woman $80,000 for sharing a data copy of a song morally sound? $80,000 a song for 24 songs. That's likely twice her yearly income, per song. Is that moral? Who's the victim here?
If the pro-copyright movement could have their way, you'd be paying every time you heard a song. It's beyond protecting artists. It's just an absurd position and it's a result of the commercialization of art.
Is charging a woman $80,000 for sharing a data copy of a song morally sound? $80,000 a song for 24 songs. That's likely twice her yearly income, per song. Is that moral? Who's the victim here?
- Meatball
