(December 29, 2022 at 10:20 pm)Jehanne Wrote:(December 29, 2022 at 2:28 pm)Angrboda Wrote: Science is empirical, not materialistic. The idea that science is materialistic is a misnomer. If science determined that the observations supported a world made of pixie dust, that would be what it decides.
The idea that science assumes materialism is a common misconception.
What you are claiming is just nuts. Materialism, per Merriam-Webster, means:
Quote:a theory that physical matter is the only or fundamental reality and that all being and processes and phenomena can be explained as manifestations or results of matter (see MATTER entry 1 sense 2)
scientific materialism
The United States National Academy of Sciences stated the following:
Quote:Many scientific theories are so well-established that no new evidence is likely to alter them substantially. For example, no new evidence will demonstrate that the Earth does not orbit around the sun (heliocentric theory), or that living things are not made of cells (cell theory), that matter is not composed of atoms, or that the surface of the Earth is not divided into solid plates that have moved over geological timescales (the theory of plate tectonics). Like these other foundational scientific theories, the theory of evolution is supported by so many observations and confirming experiments that scientists are confident that the basic components of the theory will not be overturned by new evidence. However, like all scientific theories, the theory of evolution is subject to continuing refinement as new areas of science emerge or as new technologies enable observations and experiments that were not possible previously.
And the statement says NOTHING about matter being the only or fundamental reality. it talks about the composition of matter, but not whether or not matter is fundamental.
And, in fact, even defining matter is tricky. Is light matter? Are neutrinos? They are certainly *physical*, but I think very few scientists would say that light is matter or material. I have even seen a "definition" of matter as that which is made up of first generation fermions (up and down quarks and electrons).
The essence of science is the scientific method: to test all ideas via observation, to only consider ideas that are testable (usually falsifiable) and to agree to modify or eliminate those ideas that are shown wrong via observation.
Nothing in this method *requires* 'matter' or even 'physical' aspects to be fundamental.