(January 26, 2023 at 3:31 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote:(January 26, 2023 at 11:29 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Not necessarily. Suppose I make the claim, without a study, that trees are made of wood. Someone conducts a flawed study which concludes that trees are made of pickled beets.
Which claim is ‘way more wrong’?
Boru
Are you a rationalist or an empiricist? Because what you say seems to be against empiricism.
I’m an empirical rationalist, but that’s hardly the point. YOU made the claim that a non-study conclusion is always more wrong than a study-based conclusion. The hypothetical above was intending to point out how bone-headedly stupid your claim is.
Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson