For example, it was widely reported that Hunter Biden's laptop was some kind of Russian scheme.
Max Abrahms recently wrote the following:
The point is that the story doesn't have to be true to be effective. It just has to be widely repeated at the right time. Retractions, if any, can be done quietly later on.
Just for reference, here is Abrahm's resume:
Max Abrahms recently wrote the following:
Quote:Right before the election America’s top intel veterans (e.g., 5 former CIA Directors) published a letter that Hunter’s laptop was Russian. The media repeated the absurdity as fact. Joe cited the absurdity in the debates to silence the matter. Hunter now admits the laptop was his.
The point is that the story doesn't have to be true to be effective. It just has to be widely repeated at the right time. Retractions, if any, can be done quietly later on.
Just for reference, here is Abrahm's resume:
Quote:Dr. Max Abrahms is among the world's leading experts on the subject of terrorism. Currently, he is a professor of political science and public policy at Northeastern University. He has held various affiliations with the Center for International Security and Cooperation at Stanford University, the Empirical Studies of Conflict project at Princeton University and Stanford University, the Dickey Center for International Understanding at Dartmouth College, the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point Military Academy, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Center for Cyber and Homeland Security at George Washington University, the Center for the Study of Terrorism in Rome, the Moshe Dayan Center at Tel Aviv University, the economics department at Bar Ilan University, the political science department at Johns Hopkins University, and the Belfer Center at Harvard University.
