(December 10, 2011 at 8:52 pm)Perhaps Wrote:(December 10, 2011 at 8:48 pm)Norfolk And Chance Wrote:(December 10, 2011 at 8:42 pm)Perhaps Wrote: I agree with you're post completely, but I think that what must be realized is just as perception is intent-sensitive, so is thought process.
Those who think rationally view their method of thought as correct and superior because it is intent-sensitive. It cannot itself be proven except with the use of rational thought.
So this means God is real, right?
Lets just get down to business.
My intention isn't to discuss God.
My intention is to discuss the subjectivity of thought. Deductive conclusions mean nothing if they aren't objective. My stance doesn't support either side of the argument.
I'm really looking for someone to answer the initial question. Is it possible to rationally prove that rationality is the best thought process?
Sorry to confuse. It wasn't my intention.
I can't even understand what you are trying to say, tbh.
Although I'd suggest you must have a motive to moot that rational thought is no better than irrational thought or whatever it is that you're talking about.
Further from that I'd deduce the motive would be...oooooh I dunno... backing up irrational arguments for deities - you are open minded after all.
You are currently experiencing a lucky and very brief window of awareness, sandwiched in between two periods of timeless and utter nothingness. So why not make the most of it, and stop wasting your life away trying to convince other people that there is something else? The reality is obvious.
