I feel that a problem lay in the language of thought. Language helps to form concepts of the mental images we see during thought. Language is a limited process. It has its boundaries within its properties. If it was boundless, it would have no distinction from one word to the next.
Another problem I feel is the duality of the human mind searching for patterns. The human mind searching for patterns in everything it perceives can be both good and bad. It is this ability that has created cures for diseases, but also notices "The man in the moon". Culture plays strong upon our intent for the search of patterns, and therefore some may see a face in the moon, where others (such as native Americans) will see a rabbit, or a man grinding medicine. It is a duality as the search for patterns can turn up useful and useless information, and sometimes simultaneously.
God isnt actually the biggest question in my mind. The biggest question in my mind is if my perception can be trusted, or to put it more descriptively "can I know that what I see is fact?". I am WELL aware that my thoughts are biased in many more ways than just one.
Absurdism is related to agnosticism, in that it claims no perceivable way to know for a fact wether or not deities exist or not. As the philosophy points out, if there is a designer (single god, multiple deities, whatever) then that designer would be responsible for the absurd human/cosmos relationship.
I personally feel very strong on the notion that the concept of deities, supernatural, that sort of stuff, is based on these biased paterns. A group of events may happen, and even though they are completely unrelated in reality, the human mind still tries to find a related pattern to connect them all.
Another problem I feel is the duality of the human mind searching for patterns. The human mind searching for patterns in everything it perceives can be both good and bad. It is this ability that has created cures for diseases, but also notices "The man in the moon". Culture plays strong upon our intent for the search of patterns, and therefore some may see a face in the moon, where others (such as native Americans) will see a rabbit, or a man grinding medicine. It is a duality as the search for patterns can turn up useful and useless information, and sometimes simultaneously.
God isnt actually the biggest question in my mind. The biggest question in my mind is if my perception can be trusted, or to put it more descriptively "can I know that what I see is fact?". I am WELL aware that my thoughts are biased in many more ways than just one.
Absurdism is related to agnosticism, in that it claims no perceivable way to know for a fact wether or not deities exist or not. As the philosophy points out, if there is a designer (single god, multiple deities, whatever) then that designer would be responsible for the absurd human/cosmos relationship.
I personally feel very strong on the notion that the concept of deities, supernatural, that sort of stuff, is based on these biased paterns. A group of events may happen, and even though they are completely unrelated in reality, the human mind still tries to find a related pattern to connect them all.
