RE: That Thread Written by ChatGPT
May 11, 2023 at 8:38 am
(This post was last modified: May 11, 2023 at 8:56 am by Neo-Scholastic.)
Real me...
I simply asked ChatGPT to write a post for atheistforums.org from the perspective of Swedenborg. Then I asked it to ridicule the first first post. For the reply to Fake Messiah, I asked for reply that explains Swedenborg's belief in life on other planets in terms of alchemical symbolism. I really did not have any overt intentions by creating the thread other than being transparent by 1) posting in "Off Topic", 2) putting ChatGPT in the title, and 3) posting the uneditted text.
Kinda just wanted to see what would happen. Perhaps some people would share their own generated text for replies. Or their own experiences with ChatGPT.
@Bel, there is a desktop version that does not require a phone.
@Fake, the "cut and paste" rule IMHO would not apply since the generated text was prompted by my own seed text and not publicly available. That said, I could see a rule against entirely AI generated text, since that undermines the social aspect of social media although how the mods would detect and enforce such a rule IDK.
One thing I have noticed is that ChatGPT tends to be very wordy.
@emjay, ChatGPT interpreted my initial request to produce an atheistic take on Swedenborg. I had asked for a post for atheist forums from a Swedenborgian perspective. It assumed I was an atheist. Also curious is how the ChatGPT has better manners than either Fake or Nudge, even when it was asked to ridicule.
I simply asked ChatGPT to write a post for atheistforums.org from the perspective of Swedenborg. Then I asked it to ridicule the first first post. For the reply to Fake Messiah, I asked for reply that explains Swedenborg's belief in life on other planets in terms of alchemical symbolism. I really did not have any overt intentions by creating the thread other than being transparent by 1) posting in "Off Topic", 2) putting ChatGPT in the title, and 3) posting the uneditted text.
Kinda just wanted to see what would happen. Perhaps some people would share their own generated text for replies. Or their own experiences with ChatGPT.
@Bel, there is a desktop version that does not require a phone.
@Fake, the "cut and paste" rule IMHO would not apply since the generated text was prompted by my own seed text and not publicly available. That said, I could see a rule against entirely AI generated text, since that undermines the social aspect of social media although how the mods would detect and enforce such a rule IDK.
One thing I have noticed is that ChatGPT tends to be very wordy.
@emjay, ChatGPT interpreted my initial request to produce an atheistic take on Swedenborg. I had asked for a post for atheist forums from a Swedenborgian perspective. It assumed I was an atheist. Also curious is how the ChatGPT has better manners than either Fake or Nudge, even when it was asked to ridicule.
<insert profound quote here>
