RE: The Principle of Contingent Causation: The Impossibility of Infinite Regress.
July 22, 2023 at 2:45 pm
(This post was last modified: July 22, 2023 at 3:27 pm by Bucky Ball.)
NX
So you claim. You have no cumulative case, or any case.
Anything you claim about your religion, FAR FAR more people, billions upon billions of them in other religions can claim to have had all the same subjective experiences you claim.
A lot of people on drugs have the same experiences.
Your endorphin and oxytocin mediated brain experiences are evidence of nothing.
None of it is evidence of any kind. There is no evidence at all. Subjective experiences are not evidence.
You really should learn how to debate. Religious experiences are sensory, brain mediated and no case at all for religion.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/religio...experience
Stick your praying and seeking up your ass. We don't pray. How stupid are you ? If you actually think someone can pray who has no beliefs, you're even more stupid than we thought.
There was no trial of Jesus. The gospels state very different things about them, they're not even on the same day.
What other Galilean peasants got trials before Roman aristocrats ?
BTW, you're teaching the heresy of Feeneyism.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feeneyism
Quote:GN, you seem to be missing the point of what a cumulative case is. All the factors mentioned add to the cumulative case for Christ. It doesn't have to be any one of them in isolation. Btw, Scripture and Catholic Teaching forbid lying and bearing false witness, as false witnesses lyingly did against Christ at His Trial. We are not bearing false witness or lying. We are bearing witness to the Truth, like the Apostles and Martyrs for Christ did. It's true we've not directly seen Christ Risen as they did. But other than that, as they experienced Him, we've experienced Him too, and thus bear true witness to Him Who is Truth. I'm content to leave it at that for now. Pray and seek, and you will find the Truth. Those who want the Truth will find it. The evidence has already been given.
So you claim. You have no cumulative case, or any case.
Anything you claim about your religion, FAR FAR more people, billions upon billions of them in other religions can claim to have had all the same subjective experiences you claim.
A lot of people on drugs have the same experiences.
Your endorphin and oxytocin mediated brain experiences are evidence of nothing.
None of it is evidence of any kind. There is no evidence at all. Subjective experiences are not evidence.
You really should learn how to debate. Religious experiences are sensory, brain mediated and no case at all for religion.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/religio...experience
Stick your praying and seeking up your ass. We don't pray. How stupid are you ? If you actually think someone can pray who has no beliefs, you're even more stupid than we thought.
There was no trial of Jesus. The gospels state very different things about them, they're not even on the same day.
What other Galilean peasants got trials before Roman aristocrats ?
BTW, you're teaching the heresy of Feeneyism.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feeneyism
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist