I'm not sure if my "proof by contradiction" is necessarily a good argument against karma, let alone a hands-down defeater of karma as I present it to be. Nonetheless, I made the post, and I'm curious A) does my argument constitute a valid case against karma B) To what extent (is it a standalone hands-down defeater of karma?) and C) what arguments against karma would you personally point to if asked?
As far as I understand it, karma can be real only if time is like a circle and there is no first sentient being to ever suffer.
It seems to me that if you believe there was a first ever sentient being to suffer, then you necessarily must believe that karma cannot be real.
D) Are there ways to debunk Karma even while believing that there was not a first ever sentient being to suffer?
As far as I understand it, karma can be real only if time is like a circle and there is no first sentient being to ever suffer.
It seems to me that if you believe there was a first ever sentient being to suffer, then you necessarily must believe that karma cannot be real.
D) Are there ways to debunk Karma even while believing that there was not a first ever sentient being to suffer?
