Argument against atheism

[The Grand Nudger]

So, more of the "most correctly termed" bullshit? I think I know what's happened here. You have bit's and pieces from someone else's argument, an argument which you are incapable of presenting in an organized fashion. That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

You still don't have an argument against atheism. You're merely repeating your beliefs regarding atheism (and other subjects). Making claims without elaborating upon them or demonstrating their veracity. When all else fails, you just start the loop over again. It was bullshit at post#1, bullshit it remains. I believe that you believe these things, you needn't repeat them over and over. What you need to do (if you want to posess that argument you made a claim to) is demonstrate that your beliefs aren't simply of a projection of whats floating around in your head onto the cosmos. This is something I haven't even seen you attempt. It's all been playground garbage thusfar, you sticking your fingers in your ears and repeating yourself as though no one were speaking with you or addressing your claims. Calvinist by chance?