(October 20, 2023 at 12:03 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote:(October 19, 2023 at 2:51 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: You seem to not understand what a ‘suitcase nuke’ is. It’s essentially a small, low-yield nuclear weapon that can be manufactured by someone with (relatively) low-grade engineering skills. Since the dissolution of the USSR, a lot of national security groups have been concerned about fissile materials falling into terrorist hands.
Please answer the question.
Boru
Edit: Also, if you could do us all a favour and ease off on the big fat text, that’d be great.
There is a lower limit to how small and how weak a simple nuclear bomb can be because it takes a certain critical mass of fissile material to get a proper nuclear explosion going in the straight forward manner. That lower limit is in the rough ballpark of the Hiroshima bomb. Making a weapon substantially smaller and less powerful than that is actually technically quite challenging and it took the superpowers over 10 years to achieve after their first successful nuclear bombs. A terrorist organization not heavily backed by a major state player is unlikely to be an able to build one. What terrorists who get their hands on fissile material what they can do is to build a crude sloppy dirty bomb that doesn’t initiate an actual nuclear explosion but use conventional explosives to pulverize the fissile material and contaminate the area with radioactive material.
Ok.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax