(October 30, 2023 at 10:59 am)Ahriman Wrote:(October 30, 2023 at 10:53 am)FrustratedFool Wrote: Cool.
1) Does heteronormative, in your opinion, include allosexuality (so asexuals are lgbtq+)?
2) What about non-binary genders?
3) What about objectum/ficto- sexuality?
4) What about polyamory?
5) What about serious fetishism?
1) Not really, I mean the other categories are all different forms of sexuality and asexuality is just a lack of sexuality so it doesn't really fit in with the rest
2) They might not actually exist, so they might not belong
3) I don't know what that is
4) No
5) No
A common asexual response would be that they are not heteronormative noe allonormative and are therefore queer in a society dominated by heteronormative views of relationship (which results in their ostracisation and discrimination to various degrees). 'A' has been part of lgbtq+ for some time now based on this idea. What would your counter-response be?
I'm not sure what you mean by NBi genders not actually existing given gender is meant here as a social construct, rhus if people declare themselves NBi it exists. Can you clarify?
Objectums have attraction/love with non-organics (objects and concepts), fictos with fictional characters. Fictos are often included under the asexual umbrella, as are to a lesser extent objectums.
Polyamorous and fethish activists might argue that they are also outside heteronormative society, and face discrimination because of that. What would your response be?
