(December 21, 2011 at 2:44 pm)Epimethean Wrote: No, the passage is there to help you get your point that Typhon and Set are one and the same,..
(December 21, 2011 at 3:04 pm)Rhythm Wrote: As were the priests of Egypt before him. If we trudge along with the same line of reasoning any information they conveyed must not have been imagined.
My…precious friends,
you read my post up to where Plutarch’s passage is quoted, you found the excuse you were looking for, you did not bother to read any further and thus you missed all the fun!
The information that the Egyptian passage conveys is that the primitive men who took millions of years to be created by bibi/Bebon were transformed into proper men by means of the phallus of the gods.
Who cares whether the name given to the creator of the savages is Bibi, Bebon, tbn, Typhon, Set or Suty?
I was expecting you to cry out loud that the translation of your academic translators is the correct one and that I have manufactured mine.
Or maybe I am mistaken and eventually you recognized Academia’s incredible blunder on the specific subject.
hock: 