Lazy Atheism?

[Thumpalumpacus]

Non-overlapping magisteria? That’s a very fancy set of words.

[...]

NOMA?
This is from wikipedia:

Francis Collins criticized what he saw as the limits of NOMA, arguing that science, religion, and other spheres have "partially overlapped" while agreeing with Gould that morals, spirituality and ethics cannot be determined from naturalistic interpretation.[14]

I thought that naturalistic explanations did cover morals, spirituality and ethics and that there is no evidence of anything supernatural.

You appear to be under the impression that I support the notion of NOMA. I don't. I was pointing out that the majority of American Christians don't, either, as a rereading of my post will show.