(December 21, 2011 at 5:31 pm)reverendjeremiah Wrote: strange how cosmological fine tuning is an argument used often as proof of god.... but the fact that a penis can easily (for the most part) slip up an ass is not considered proof of a divine creation.
Cold, lifeless rocks floating in space = god
buttsecks = not god
I trust I'm not the only one to think the penis is a better "proof" than the banana?
"handle that fits into the human grip"
"outward indications of being ready for consumption"
"fits perfectly into the human mouth"
And hey, unlike with wild bananas, swallowing the seeds is no problem.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
