I think we should be careful to distinguish between "freedom of speech" as in "regulated by government", its original meaning, and socially acceptable speech as well as limitations/infringements by corporations like X.
What MM666 said is nonsense with regard to the original meaning of government limitations, because every government of every state on this planet limits speech.period. Nobody has "absolute " free speech, and frankly, nobody wants. Did he conflate this with the other two on purpose? I dont now, but he seemingly did, trying to shove a popular fantasy down our throats about "america the free" which it isnt, by a fair margin, in many regards.
And thnx for pointing out that the USA ranks far below, and not at, 1st regarding freedom of press.
What MM666 said is nonsense with regard to the original meaning of government limitations, because every government of every state on this planet limits speech.period. Nobody has "absolute " free speech, and frankly, nobody wants. Did he conflate this with the other two on purpose? I dont now, but he seemingly did, trying to shove a popular fantasy down our throats about "america the free" which it isnt, by a fair margin, in many regards.
And thnx for pointing out that the USA ranks far below, and not at, 1st regarding freedom of press.
Cetero censeo religionem delendam esse
